- Posts: 1563
- Thank you received: 55
August Challenge: Bug Hunt
July entries (entry): Cyber crime
The shoutbox is unavailable to non-members
Anyway, See you tomorrow, unless you're sleeping all day to make up for today. Important, change your password!
Go here for further information: https://cgartnexus.com/index.php/forum/announcements/840-hacked
Crankshaft's Sketchbook
- crankshaft
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Charlotte wrote: Rule no. 1: The only fail is not trying
You're really good with mechs and artificial shapes, but you're also starting to really improve with your anatomy and gesture studies, you know. Your first figures looked like mechs or piles opf boxes rather than soft fleshed people, and that's much different now. Just keep going. And remember the rule!
Thanks so much Char! Your comment made me chuckle bc I actually looked back at my old figures and they look like spaghetti! The struggle is real
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- crankshaft
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1563
- Thank you received: 55
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- crankshaft
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1563
- Thank you received: 55
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- crankshaft
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1563
- Thank you received: 55
Another cgma assignment. The goal was to paint over the values of the painting provided. Learned so much about color, temperature, variation and saturation.
I told myself to just do some blind sketching without design specs to loosen up and now the fail is even bigger. I've learned a lot here. It's far better to always design with some specs bc that directs all your shapes and ensures consistency. Plus that's what you'll be doing in the real world. It also gives you something to draw ie if you're drawing a plane that carries heavy cargo then you know it needs wings, propellers, landing gear, a large fuselage, heavy duty engines etc. These are some kind of drones.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- microscopi
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 743
- Thank you received: 79
You're obiously discovering your strengths so far to be non mechanical inorganic objects, you are definitely not failing there. You can't be a master with every aspect most artists pick a style and subject and perfect that.
I know you have to learn anatomy, color, light, perspective shape design..etc. but you should have confidence knowing you are getting real good at one style of art. The anatomy studies will start to look better and better too, I remember a time when some of your mechanical structures looked flat, but now look at your stuff, complete 180
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- crankshaft
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1563
- Thank you received: 55
Flying aircraft carrier. Guessed at perspective but I wanted to see how well I could design something without thumbs, which I'll be doing next since I want a slightly more sci fi version. Loads of design problems here, too many identical proportions, poor silhouette, poor shapes, too blocky.
Some thumbs (?) or iterations of the front nose of the ship.
Some random doodles. Was trying to figure out what to draw next.
Anatomy fail.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- crankshaft
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1563
- Thank you received: 55
microscopi wrote: Those environment sketches are looking awesome Crank, the mech is looking equally as awesome!
You're obiously discovering your strengths so far to be non mechanical inorganic objects, you are definitely not failing there. You can't be a master with every aspect most artists pick a style and subject and perfect that.
I know you have to learn anatomy, color, light, perspective shape design..etc. but you should have confidence knowing you are getting real good at one style of art. The anatomy studies will start to look better and better too, I remember a time when some of your mechanical structures looked flat, but now look at your stuff, complete 180You'll get there with anatomy too.soon.
Thanks man for taking the time to write all that. Means a lot ! I don't think I'm getting good at anything, even mechanical things...I look at guys like Scott Robertson and I wonder if it'll take another 100 years.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- crankshaft
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1563
- Thank you received: 55
Schoolism assignment wip. Still focusing on the basics first.
Anatomy fail.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- crankshaft
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1563
- Thank you received: 55
Visual library/draftsmanship studies. The new Bugatti Veyron Gt Sport. Look at those crazy forms. Definitely something I could use later.
However the car was really hard to do at first so here's the first attempt. I came up a with a little tip that helps with measuring proportions. I can draw cars but not people >< Goes off in a corner and cries.
Schoolism wip.
Anatomy fail.
Some thumbs of that aircraft carrier. Still not happy with any of them. ><
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Digital Dave
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2247
- Thank you received: 163
Hoping to start sketching here some myself, but won't probably do much this coming week though. Took the whole weekend getting my new setup together, transferring stuff over, etc.
I get sketchy around pencils! ...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Facebook Feed
Member Statistics
- Total Users: 226
- Latest User: norajohnson
- Online Users: 0
- Users Today: 0
- Users this Week: 0
- Users this Month: 0
- Users this Year: 0
NOTE! This site uses cookies and similar technologies.
By using this website you agree to the use of cookies and related data storage as detailed in our privacy policy. Learn more
Site design Mad Hamster Studios. All content is protected under © and the property of the various contributers and not to be reproduced without permission of the creator.

I doubt it 

